© 2025 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Public Media from Michigan State University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Biofuels advocate dismisses UM emissions study favoring fossil fuels

cornfield photo
pixabay
The Renewable Fuels Association is responding negatively to University of Michigan researcher John DiCicco's study indicating that biofuels do more harm to the environment than fossil fuels.

A University of Michigan researcher says the environmental benefits of biofuels are exaggerated, so much so that he says burning fossil fuels is better. On our Tuesday environmental segment, a biofuels industry spokesman responds.

Last week on Current State’s weekly environmental segment, we learned about an attention-getting study from the University of Michigan Energy Institute. The institute’s John DiCicco said it found that biofuels are not, as often touted, carbon neutral. That is, the emissions from biofuels like ethanol are not entirely reabsorbed by plant life.

Biofuels supporters have taken issue with the report.

Current State speaks with Geoff Cooper of the Washington D.C. based Renewable Fuels Association.

Current State discusses Michigan’s environment every Tuesday. Our segments, and others about the Great Lakes environment, can be found at GreatLakesEcho.org and at wkar.org.

Related Content
Every WKAR News story you read is rooted in fact-based, local journalism, produced without commercial influence and available for free to everyone in mid-Michigan. No paywalls. Ever.

But this work doesn’t fund itself. With significant cuts to federal funding, public media is facing a critical moment. If you believe in journalism that serves the public interest, now is the time to act. Donate today.