Most Active Stories
- Michigan legislators join national push for Constitutional Convention
- A hunt gone wrong: One man's story of survival in the Alaskan wilderness
- DOWNTON ABBEY Special Preview Screening!
- Medical Marijuana Activists Cheer As Dispensaries, “Medibles” Bills Clear House Panel
- Book Review: Mitch Albom's 'The First Phone Call from Heaven'
Thu May 2, 2013
Supreme Court Declines To Hear Live-In Partner Benefits Case
The Michigan Supreme Court has declined to hear a challenge to the policy that allows live-in partners of state employees to be covered by their health coverage.
As we hear from The Michigan Public Radio Network’s Rick Pluta, the court’s decision allows the policy to stand.
The benefit was negotiated as part of most state employee contracts. Attorney General Bill Schuette challenged the benefit. He says providing insurance for live-in partners violates the state’s ban on recognition of same-sex marriage and civil unions. The amendment was approved by voters in 2004.
Schuette also said the policy discriminates against married couples. Lower courts dismissed Schuette’s lawsuit. They said the policy does not make any distinction between people in same-sex relationships and male-female relationships. About 150 state employees currently have live-in partners and their children covered by their health plans.