Shaheen Dhada is an unlikely looking protagonist in the battle under way in India to protect free speech from government restrictions in the new media age.
Slight and soft-spoken, Dhada perches on the edge of her bed in a purple-walled room that has been her own for the past 20 years. Outside, police officers are posted for her protection in the town of Palghar, 2 1/2 hours outside Mumbai.
The 21-year-old management science grad's Facebook post last week triggered her arrest and the wrath of local residents. Her "crime" was questioning the shutdown of Mumbai as mourners gathered for the cremation of Bal Thackeray, who had dominated the city's political stage for decades with cagey intimidation tactics.
In a Facebook post on Nov. 18, Dhada wrote: "Every day thousands of people die, but still the world moves on. ... Today, Mumbai shuts down out of fear, not out of respect."
Within minutes, she got a call from a stranger. "And he told me, 'Do you really think whatever you posted is right?' " Dhada says. "I was actually confused about what he was asking for."
She hung up and deleted her comment. But by then a mob had gathered at her uncle's medical clinic around the corner, smashing windows and equipment, and vandalizing the operating room.
"Within 10 minutes, the police came and told me to come to the police station. I had to apologize in a written statement," says Dhada, who was held until 2 a.m. and then released on bail. A friend of hers, Renu Srinivasan, who "liked" the post, had been detained with her. A mob descended on the station. Dhada says she couldn't see it, but heard: "They were shouting, and at that time I was really very scared."
Meanwhile, Dhada's father, Farooq Dhada, says his family cowered inside their home for hours in the darkness, afraid the mob would come for them next.
The episode has shaken the Muslim father of two, who says he never expected things to escalate to such a frightening pitch. Reflecting on the incident days later, he says freedom of speech in India "exists only on paper." He says he doubts the common person feels any sense of security — no matter what religion they are.
Shiv Sena's Legacy Of Violence
Shaheen Dhada's post had angered followers of Thackeray, a political cartoonist turned Hindu hard-liner. His Hindu party, Shiv Sena, won popular appeal in the state of Maharashtra, where Mumbai is located. Exploiting enmity against migrants from other states, the party encouraged brute force to win jobs and opportunities.
Journalist Naresh Fernandes says when Hindu nationalism became a potent force, Shiv Sena turned its ire on Mumbai's Muslims — igniting riots that killed 900 people in 1992 and '93.
Thackeray fanned the violence, Fernandes says, by "making extremely provocative statements essentially calling upon his followers to attack Muslims."
Vaibhav Purandare, author of The Shiv Sena Story, says the party's legacy of violence has cost it support over the years.
"They refused to believe that the India of the 21st century was very different from the India of the 20th century ... when a section [of the population] would not mind the use of violence," Purandare says. The bust-up of the medical clinic "shows they continue with violence tactics," he adds.
Anil Desai, the secretary of Shiv Sena, says it is not a matter of disowning the violence. "It was an emotional outburst," he says, "and the incidents ... were blown out of proportion, that much I say."
Inciting Religious Enmity
At a restaurant in Palghar on Friday night, the talk among locals turned to the Facebook row. Sunil Mahendrakar said Dhada should be prohibited from posting comments critical of Thackeray because he was considered a father figure to many, if not to her.
"Talking cheap or bad about somebody's father should be denied, anywhere in the world. In India ... in America," he said. "It's wrong."
Retired Supreme Court Justice Markandey Katju says every freedom is subject to "reasonable restrictions in the public interest." But he says in the case of Dhada, her post actually underscores a Supreme Court ruling that bringing a city to a standstill is illegal.
"You can mourn a death in whichever way you want, but you can't bring a whole city to a stoppage. So what this girl wrote was in consonance with the verdict of the Supreme Court — nothing illegal," Katju says.
Nonetheless, police charged Dhada under a statute that makes it a crime to promote "religious enmity" between groups. The initial police report refers to her as a Muslim. But Dhada says she does not believe she was singled out for her faith.
Writer Fernandes says it's more likely police were scrambling for a convenient hook on which to hang a charge.
"They needed to find a cause of anger and suggested that she, as a Muslim girl, had insulted them, who were Hindus," he says. "That's ridiculous. She questioned why a city shut down after Bal Thackeray's death — and Bal Thackeray is not a religion; he's a leader of a political party."
The general consensus seems to be that the police not only misapplied the law but also succumbed to the will of the mob.
"There were thousands of guys outside their police station and inside the station house who were doing what the Shiv Sena has always done — threatening to burn the town up," Fernandes says. "They just wanted to get them off their backs and wanted to make sure that order was maintained even as they didn't quite uphold the law."
The case also throws a harsh light on India's new Information Technology Act that governs electronic speech. Police charged Dhada with violating a section of the law, which prohibits speech that, among other things, causes "annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will."
Pranesh Prakash, the director of the Centre for Internet and Society, says it's a poorly drafted catchall. Under such a sweeping statute, Prakash says, 95 percent of India's Internet users could well be imprisoned.
"I have 3,500 followers on Twitter, and I'm pretty sure I annoy 100 of them on a daily basis," he says.
Tackling issues of communal harmony is a serious issue in India, but, Prakash says, "it should not lead to forsaking fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution."
The government conferred Thursday over problems with the IT Act, while the Supreme Court is hearing challenges to it.
Shaheen Dhada and Renu Srinivasan are not expected to face prosecution under the country's controversial IT Act or any other law. Following a public outcry, two senior officials from the local Palghar police have been suspended and a magistrate transferred.
From her self-imposed house arrest, Dhada says she'll venture back onto Facebook, but her experience is certain to color her musings.
"I don't want this to happen again," she says, laughing, "but I'll be careful next time."
RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:
Let's turn now to a story from India, a story that involves the freedom to speak out and to criticize the powerful. It's a controversy that could only have emerged in this era of social media. Two young women jailed for a Facebook posting, which one wrote and the other simply liked. From Mumbai, NPR's Julie McCarthy examines the case that has sparked a debate in India about whether bad law, bad police work or both is curbing freedom of speech.
JULIE MCCARTHY, BYLINE: Shaheen Dhada sits on the edge of her bed in a purple-walled room that has been her own for 20 years. Outside, police sit posted for her protection in the small town of Palghar, two and a half hours outside Mumbai. The slight, soft-spoken 21-year-old is the latest test of Indian free speech. Her offense: questioning the shutdown of Mumbai last week for mourners at the cremation of a leader who had dominated the city's politics with cagey intimidation tactics. Her Facebook post read: Every day thousands of people die, but still the world moves on. Today, Mumbai shuts down out of fear, not out of respect. Within minutes of the posting, she got a phone call from a stranger.
SHAHEEN DHADA: And he just told me, do you really think whatever you posted is right? So I was actually confused what he's asking for.
MCCARTHY: She hung up and deleted her comment. By then a mob was descending on her uncle's medical clinic around the corner, smashing up equipment and vandalizing the operating room.
DHADA: And within 10 minutes police came and they told me to come to police station. I had to apologize in written statement. So when I went there, there was a huge mob. I didn't saw the mob but I can hear them.
MCCARTHY: What were they saying?
DHADA: They were shouting. They were shouting. And that time I was very, very scared, actually.
MCCARTHY: Shaheen's father, Farooq Dhada, recalls anxious hours cowering with his family inside their home on the night of Sunday, November 18, as his daughter sat in the police station.
FAROOQ DHADA: (Foreign language spoken)
MCCARTHY: He said the family hid in the dark, afraid the mob would come for them next. The episode has shaken this Muslim father of two, who says he never expected things to reach such a fever pitch. Reflecting on the incident, he says freedom of speech in India exists only on paper. His daughter's post angered followers of the late Bal Thackeray, a Hindu hardliner. His Shiv Sena party appealed to the sons of the soil and the state of Maharashtra, where Mumbai is located, exploiting enmity against migrants from other states. The party encouraged brute force to win jobs and opportunities. Journalist Naresh Fernandes says when Hindu nationalism became a potent force, Shiv Sena turned on Mumbai's Muslims. Nine hundred people died in riots in 1992 and '93. All, says Fernandes, fanned by Bal Thackeray.
NARESH FERNANDES: Making extremely provocative statements, essentially calling upon his followers to attack Muslims. And this was probably the most violent campaign that Shiv Sena had ever waged.
MCCARTHY: I asked the secretary of Shiv Sena, Anil Desai, if the party disowned the most recent violence.
ANIL DESAI: It's out of the question that we own or disown. It was an emotional outburst, and incidents here or there was blown out of proportion. That much I can say.
(SOUNDBITE OF RESTAURANT)
MCCARTHY: At a restaurant in the town of Palghar Friday night, talk among the locals turns to the Facebook row. Resident Sunil Mahendrakar says that Shaheen should have known that posting comments critical of the funeral of a man many considered a father figure would ignite a fury. Should she be denied the right to say what she freely thinks?
SUNIL MAHENDRAKAR: Talking cheap or bad about somebody's father should be denied, anywhere in the world. Not only in India - anywhere in the world, even in America.
MCCARTHY: Retired Supreme Court Justice Markandey Katju says every freedom is subject to reasonable restrictions in the public interest. But he says in the case of Shaheen, her posting actually underscores a Supreme Court ruling that bringing a city to a standstill is illegal.
MARKANDEY KATJU: You can mourn a death in whichever way you want but you can't bring the whole city to a stoppage. So what this girl wrote was in consonance with the verdict of the Supreme Court. It's nothing illegal.
MCCARTHY: Nonetheless, police charged Shaheen Dhada under a statute that makes it a crime to promote religious enmity between groups. The initial police report refers to her as a Muslim, but Shaheen says she does not believe she was singled out for her faith. Writer Naresh Fernandes says more likely police were scrambling for a convenient hook on which to hang a charge.
FERNANDES: They needed to find a cause of anger and they suggested that she as a Muslim girl had insulted them who are Hindus. It's ridiculous because she questioned why the city had shut down after Bal Thackeray's death. And Bal Thackeray is not a religion. He's a political party, the leader for a political party.
MCCARTHY: Fernandes says the general consensus is that the police panicked and succumbed to the pressure of the mob to bring charges.
FERNANDES: There were these thousands of guys outside their police station and inside the station house, and they just wanted to get them off their backs. They wanted to make sure that order was maintained even as they didn't quite uphold the law.
MCCARTHY: The case also throws a harsh light on India's new Information Technology Act that governs electronic speech. The government meets today to discuss problems with it while the Supreme Court hears challenges to it. In addition to promoting religious enmity, the Palghar police charged Shaheen with violating Section 66a of the IT Act. It proscribes speech that causes, among other things...
PRANESH PRAKASH: Annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, ill will - all these words are of a different category.
MCCARTHY: Pranesh Prakash directs the Centre for the Internet and Society and says the law is a poorly crafted catch-all. He says speech that amounts to criminal intimidation should be distinguished from speech that merely inconveniences or annoys. Prakash says 95 percent of India's Internet users could well be imprisoned under this sweeping statute.
PRAKASH: I have 3,500 followers on Twitter currently. And I'm pretty sure that I annoy at least 100 of them on a daily basis. And I definitely do not need to be prosecuted under a Section 66a for that.
MCCARTHY: Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Srinivasa, the friend who liked her Facebook post, are not expected to be prosecuted under the country's IT Act or any other law, following a public outcry. Two senior officials from the local Palghar police have been suspended for the girl's unlawful arrest. Yesterday, Shiv Sena's supporters forced a shutdown of the town to protest the police suspensions. From her self-imposed house arrest, meanwhile, Shaheen Dhada says she intends to keep quiet for now. She'll venture back onto Facebook, she says...
DHADA: But I'll be careful next time.
MCCARTHY: Julie McCarthy, NPR News, Mumbai. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.